X

IBM's quantum computing ambitions get exponential like Moore's Law

You may not understand qubits, but you can certainly tell that scoring 16 is twice as good as scoring 8.

Stephen Shankland Former Principal Writer
Stephen Shankland worked at CNET from 1998 to 2024 and wrote about processors, digital photography, AI, quantum computing, computer science, materials science, supercomputers, drones, browsers, 3D printing, USB, and new computing technology in general. He has a soft spot in his heart for standards groups and I/O interfaces. His first big scoop was about radioactive cat poop.
Expertise Processors, semiconductors, web browsers, quantum computing, supercomputers, AI, 3D printing, drones, computer science, physics, programming, materials science, USB, UWB, Android, digital photography, science. Credentials
  • Shankland covered the tech industry for more than 25 years and was a science writer for five years before that. He has deep expertise in microprocessors, digital photography, computer hardware and software, internet standards, web technology, and more.
Stephen Shankland
2 min read
IBM's System Q quantum computer looks like no other computer you've ever seen. When running, it's hidden inside a chamber to chill it to a temperature colder than interstellar space.
Enlarge Image
IBM's System Q quantum computer looks like no other computer you've ever seen. When running, it's hidden inside a chamber to chill it to a temperature colder than interstellar space.

IBM's System Q quantum computer looks like no other computer you've ever seen. When running, it's hidden inside a chamber to chill it to a temperature colder than interstellar space.

Stephen Shankland/CNET

Quantum computers are just weird, with data processed by qubits that can store ones and zeros at the same time. But they're like regular "classical" computers in one obvious way: Their designers want them to run faster.

Now, with machines like its Q System One, IBM has not only proposed a convenient single number to calibrate a speedometer but also laid out an ambitious dotted line stretching across a road map into the future. The course it's charting aims to double performance each year so quantum computers can achieve what Big Blue calls quantum advantage, in which quantum computers are faster or more efficient at a task than a classical computer or accomplish something a classical computer simply can't.

The speedometer is calibrated in a figure called quantum volume that measures not only how many qubits a quantum computer has -- a key measure of its data-processing ability -- but also how much use the computer can get out of the notoriously unstable qubits. IBM quantum computers reached quantum volume of 4 in 2017, then 8 in 2018, and now 16 with the Q System One.

IBM hopes to double quantum computer performance annually, progress that shows as a straight line on this chart.

IBM hopes to double quantum computer performance annually, progress that shows as a straight line on this chart.

IBM Research

That doubling is a quantum parallel to Moore's Law, the famous observation by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore about the exponential progress of conventional computer chips. Moore's Law held steady for decades, but it's faltering now as miniaturizing processor circuitry gets harder and harder -- a reality that's making quantum computing more important as a possible way to continue progress in the industry.

If IBM's idea catches on with other quantum computing companies like Microsoft, Google and Rigetti Computing, it could give people who don't have a Ph.D. in quantum physics a better idea about progress in this difficult subject. If not, well, at least it gives us a clear way to see if IBM is passing the milestones toward commercial use of quantum computing.

"To achieve quantum advantage in the 2020s, we need to at least double quantum volume every year," IBM researchers Jay Gambetta and Sarah Sheldon said in a blog post.

IBM revealed the results at the 2019 American Physical Society March Meeting, That venue shows just how far quantum computing has to go before it moves from physics research to more down-to-earth engineering and computer science.