You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 1, 2021. It is now read-only.
Is there a way by which Swarm cluster can be created by pointing to a Discovery Service that is hosted inside the firewall? Basically, make Discovery Service as another Docker image that can run inside the firewall.
This can be useful for default installations where they don't have to (want to?) get into etcd, consul, or zookeper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some background: The API the discovery service is using is entirely open but the reason the implementation is not is because it has a dependency on storage (right now it's using our internal infrastructure storage) and so it wouldn't work anywhere else.
Even if we made it available, you would have to set up some kind of storage (consul, etcd, postgres, ...) for the discovery service to use, so it wouldn't solve that issue either.
Is there a way by which Swarm cluster can be created by pointing to a Discovery Service that is hosted inside the firewall? Basically, make Discovery Service as another Docker image that can run inside the firewall.
This can be useful for default installations where they don't have to (want to?) get into etcd, consul, or zookeper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: