It's not really that items are not being sized correctly, but that rows are taking the height of the first item in the row, and the items are being covered up by subsequent rows.

@ajoslin is going to take a look and see if we can get rows to take the height of the tallest item in that row without too much of a performance hit.

Note, this will mean that each row will take the height of the tallest item in that row. They wont gravitate upwards like in masonry.

Thank you for the quick reply.

It is exactly as you say. Solution that you propose is the most acceptable.
I'm fully aware of masonry and i didn't expect that kind of behavior.

Tomasz

http://control-intern-managerial.ro/utrader-instaforex

24.03.2015, 13:23, "Tomasz Pietrzak" notifications@github.com:Is there any way to make this work? (workaround?)

I want to item which 'item-height' set to a value to obey that height.
Now items in a 'row' inherit 'item-height' from item in first column and ignore it's own height.

—Reply to this email directly or .