Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build/ops: ceph.spec.in: running fdupes unnecessarily #5223

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 4, 2015

Conversation

smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

In openSUSE there is a policy to use %fdupes in the spec file if RPMLINT
complains about duplicate files wasting space in the filesystem.

However, RPMLINT is not so complaining, so drop fdupes.

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12301 Fixes: ceph#12301

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit 53072b9)
@smithfarm smithfarm self-assigned this Jul 14, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm added this to the hammer milestone Jul 14, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm assigned theanalyst and unassigned smithfarm Jul 14, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm added build/ops and removed core labels Jul 14, 2015
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 14, 2015

second occurrence of this false negative in two days. If that frequency is confirmed I'll backport the necessary changes.

@ghost ghost changed the title ceph.spec.in running fdupes unnecessarily ceph.spec.in: running fdupes unnecessarily Jul 16, 2015
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ktdreyer And in hammer, too?

@ktdreyer ktdreyer merged commit cdde626 into ceph:hammer Sep 4, 2015
ktdreyer added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2015
ceph.spec.in: running fdupes unnecessarily

Reviewed-by: Ken Dreyer <kdreyer@redhat.com>
@ktdreyer
Copy link
Member

ktdreyer commented Sep 4, 2015

Thanks!

@smithfarm smithfarm deleted the wip-12305-hammer branch September 5, 2015 07:33
@ghost ghost changed the title ceph.spec.in: running fdupes unnecessarily build/ops: ceph.spec.in: running fdupes unnecessarily Sep 13, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants