Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build/ops: ceph.spec.in: rpm: cephfs_java not fully conditionalized #5202

Merged
1 commit merged into from Aug 30, 2015

Conversation

smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

@smithfarm smithfarm added this to the hammer milestone Jul 11, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm assigned smithfarm and theanalyst and unassigned smithfarm Jul 11, 2015
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 11, 2015

@smithfarm please ignore the bot false negative, it will be fixed by #5208

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 11, 2015

@smithfarm the fix was merged, could you please rebase & repush to trigger the bot once more ?

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11991 Fixes: ceph#11991

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit 04e91bb)
@ghost ghost changed the title rpm: cephfs_java not fully conditionalized ceph.spec.in: rpm: cephfs_java not fully conditionalized Jul 15, 2015
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 30, 2015

Pass http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#ceph-deploy http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#upgrade (there are job failures but they are unrelated to packaging)

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2015
ceph.spec.in: rpm: cephfs_java not fully conditionalized

Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@ghost ghost merged commit d94e764 into ceph:hammer Aug 30, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm deleted the wip-12293-hammer branch September 5, 2015 07:40
@ghost ghost changed the title ceph.spec.in: rpm: cephfs_java not fully conditionalized build/ops: ceph.spec.in: rpm: cephfs_java not fully conditionalized Sep 13, 2015
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants