Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 24, 2020. It is now read-only.

provide more info in rkt list #1559

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 8, 2015

Conversation

blixtra
Copy link
Collaborator

@blixtra blixtra commented Oct 7, 2015

The rkt list command currently shows an inadequate amount of information to determine which image an app is associated with. For example, one could have fetched multiple versions of an image and it's possible for images to have the same name but different hashes. However, these details are not shown in the output.

This change adds the version information to the default rkt list output and adds the 12-char ID of the image to the output when the '--full' flag is used.

It also changes the 'ACI' field header to 'IMAGE NAME'.

Lastly, this PR change tries to make the term used for the image's hash value more consistent by changing the user-facing reference to "Image ID" instead of "key". "Key" is already used more adequately in the trust context.

Closes #1492

In the rkt documentation the image hash was by and large referred to as
the image ID. However, in the rkt subcommands key was often used.

This change tries to make the use of "image ID" consistant across
user-facing elements of rkt.
The `rkt list` command currently shows an inadequate amount of
information to determine which image an app is associated with. For
example, one could have fetched multiple versions of an image and it's
possible for images to have the same name but different hashes. However,
these details are not shown in the output.

This change adds the version information to the default `rkt list`
output and adds the 12-char ID of the image to the output when the
'--full' flag is used.

It also changes the 'ACI' field header to 'IMAGE NAME'.

Closes rkt#1492
@vcaputo
Copy link
Contributor

vcaputo commented Oct 7, 2015

lgtm

iaguis added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2015
@iaguis iaguis merged commit 7dc2a40 into rkt:master Oct 8, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants