Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test/subjects: Use statically imported never() methods #3340

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Sep 11, 2015

Conversation

Turbo87
Copy link

@Turbo87 Turbo87 commented Sep 11, 2015

... and remove the unused Mockito imports

... and remove the unused Mockito imports
@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

See #3291.

@Turbo87
Copy link
Author

Turbo87 commented Sep 11, 2015

@akarnokd are you seriously suggesting that cleaning up code to make it more consistent is a bad thing and shouldn't be done?

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

Cosmetic PRs, especially on unit test or on internal classes, don't really contribute anything to the library.

@Turbo87
Copy link
Author

Turbo87 commented Sep 11, 2015

wow...

@Turbo87 Turbo87 closed this Sep 11, 2015
@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

I'm okay with this type of change. It makes the code more consistent, and is a simple non-intrusive change.

benjchristensen added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2015
test/subjects: Use statically imported never() methods
@benjchristensen benjchristensen merged commit 647cede into ReactiveX:1.x Sep 11, 2015
@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

Thank you @Turbo87 for the contribution!

@Turbo87
Copy link
Author

Turbo87 commented Sep 11, 2015

@benjchristensen cool, thanks!

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

@Turbo87 I apologize for my harsh and dry comments. Generally, I'm in favor of cleanups such as yours and would have done it the same way. I was under the false impression that the project doesn't want such cleanups. I'm sorry if I offended you.

@Turbo87
Copy link
Author

Turbo87 commented Sep 11, 2015

@akarnokd nevermind, seems it all worked out in the end ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants