Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary static modifier #3147

Merged

Conversation

artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Contributor

P.S.
@benjchristensen @akarnokd sorry for large amount of simple pull requests, I'm doing full code review of RxJava sources http://artemzin.com/blog/rxjava-code-review-part-1/ and I'll create PRs and issues during this review.

I'll try to group changes by themes so it will be easy to review them. Looks like this adventure is going to be part of #3145!

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

If it were only me, I'd accept cosmetic changes such as this, but history tells me not to.

@artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@akarnokd why? Sad that javac is not strict enough and allows such things. We can add checkstyle with only java-lang rules and remove all these things from the code, but last time I suggested to add checkstyle @benjchristensen was not very happy…

I understand that RxJava is not "my project" and I can't just come and force you to use "my codestyle" (which is actually just standard java codestyle), so if you don't want to accept such changes — it's okay, I'll stop doing such PRs and will report only major issues.

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

I like this PR too much, I'm going to merge it ;)

akarnokd added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2015
…difier

Remove unnecessary static modifier
@akarnokd akarnokd merged commit bcd8b19 into ReactiveX:1.x Aug 12, 2015
@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

I like this PR too much, I'm going to merge it ;)

:-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants